NI FLOWBacked by sciencePeer-reviewed study

Backed by science.
Built to move.

Peer-reviewed research and development records examine guided lateral pedal motion from different angles: rider movement, muscle recruitment, and lower-limb mechanics.

The public evidence

A focused evidence record. One movement question.

The strongest source is a focused peer-reviewed rider study comparing standard clipless pedals, free lateral translation, and a guided variable-lateral Zivo pedal. A Cleveland State pilot and an Allegheny/Pitt mechanics manuscript add context. Each answers a different question, so each carries a different evidentiary weight.

Illustration of leg muscle engagement during a pedal stroke

Guided lateral movement

A different path through the stroke.

The studied variable-lateral pedal guided side-to-side translation through the crank rotation instead of locking the foot into one fixed path. NI Flow is built around that same motion concept: give the rider a platform that can move with the stroke. Fit and rider experience still vary, so research should inform, not replace, an individual setup decision.

The peer-reviewed rider study

A focused rider study of pedal paths.

Participants completed trials on their own bicycles with the same cleat, comparing standard, free-lateral, and guided variable-lateral pedals in randomized order. The research focused on movement and muscle activity, not clinical outcomes.

Knee and ankle tracking

Frontal-plane marker data captured how the knee and ankle moved through each pedal condition.

Muscle recruitment

Surface EMG recorded leg-muscle activation during the controlled trials.

Within-rider comparison

Each participant rode each pedal system, which limits differences caused by rider-to-rider variation.

Short lab protocol

The results describe immediate measurements in a laboratory setting, not a season of riding.

From measurement to meaning

What guided motion changed. What it can mean.

Observed in the rider study

More coordinated knee and ankle movement

A more connected lower-leg path.

In the guided condition, the knee and ankle moved more in concert. For a rider, that points to a pedal path designed to accommodate lower-leg motion rather than lock the foot into one fixed track.

Measured as a stronger knee-to-ankle movement correlation in the guided condition.

Observed at the same workload

More hip-side muscle recruitment

A stronger path to power.

The guided condition recruited more gluteus medius and tensor fasciae latae at the same rider-set workload. In plain terms: it brought more of the hip-side system into the work of producing force through the stroke. That is a credible performance mechanism.

Measured as higher gluteus medius and tensor fasciae latae EMG than standard pedals.

Observed at the same workload

Less demand on one front-of-thigh muscle

Work redistributed through the stroke.

The rectus femoris took on less work in the guided condition. In plain terms: the research saw effort shift across the leg rather than simply piling more demand onto one muscle.

Measured as lower rectus femoris EMG than standard pedals.

Supplemental university pilot

A promising oxygen-demand signal

An early efficiency lead worth testing further.

A Cleveland State University pilot reported lower oxygen deficit at its fixed workload with the prototype pedal. In plain terms: it is an early signal that the movement may change how riders meet the same demand.

Measured as lower oxygen deficit at a fixed workload in the supplemental pilot.

How to read the evidence

  • Immediate movement and muscle-activity measurements in a controlled laboratory protocol.
  • A direct comparison of standard, free-lateral, and guided variable-lateral pedal conditions.
  • The study authors identify the recruitment pattern as a potential route to higher output.
  • A university pilot and mechanics model broaden the development record.

Source record

Read the evidence in context.

The evidence record brings together a peer-reviewed rider study, a university pilot, and a mechanics manuscript.

Peer-reviewed rider study

Published laboratory paper

McCulloch, R.S. (2018). Influence of lateral pedal translation on muscle recruitment and kinematics in cyclists. Journal of Exercise Science & Fitness. The focused rider study compared pedal conditions with EMG and frontal-plane movement measurements.

Read the published paper

Exploratory rider pilot

Cleveland State report

Kenneth Sparks, Ph.D., Human Performance Laboratory. The pilot included separate efficiency and power sessions. The report is supplemental background material, not a peer-reviewed publication.

Read the supplemental report (PDF)

Biomechanics model

Allegheny/Pitt mechanics manuscript

Schimoler, Veerubhotla, Christoforetti, Stevovich, and Miller modeled how cyclic pedal translation can change hip, knee, and ankle rotation. It is a submitted mechanics manuscript, not a human trial or peer-reviewed publication.

This page is educational, not medical advice. NI Flow is not a medical device. Riders with pain, injury, or fit concerns should work with an appropriate clinician or qualified bike fitter.

Read the research notes

Founders Edition

Explore the NI Flow.

Founders Edition pairs are $199 instead of $299. Reserve one of the first 100 with a $40 refundable deposit. Shipping January 2027 from Ohio.

Reserve your pair